Economic, social and environmental:
the three realms of sustainability. If you’re not too familiar with this
concept then you must not have taken any of Dave’s courses. After ENVR 201 it’s
hard to forget. The idea behind this concept is that sustainability cannot just
develop in one realm. We, as environmental studies students, often only focus
on environmental sustainability. What we cannot forget is that unsustainable
development in any of these three categories can threaten the stability and
sustainability of society. We only need to look to China to see this concept in
action.
As Ben so eloquently put it in his
earlier blog
post (I’d recommend checking it out), China has seen explosive economic
development in the past few decades, bringing hundreds of millions of people
out of poverty, while all at the cost of her water, air and land. China threw
everything they could into creating economic development and sustainability (in
a sense, though economic inequality has never been more severe which by no
means contributes to societal stability) yet neglected the strengthening their
environmental or social sustainability (quite the opposite, actually). Well
now, it seems, it has caught up with them.
This week Treehugger.com
reported that pollution is the leading cause of social unrest in China.
Incidences of social unrest have been far and few between in communist China
for decades, but that’s slowly changing. Both western and technological
influences seem to be fueling the beginnings of a movement, whereby Chinese
citizens are standing up to the government for not only their own rights, but
for environmental rights as well. Years of oppression are beginning to fade
away as the government realizes it must adapt to a growing and powerful middle-class
citizenry sick of decades of smog and environmental destruction.
Of course, it is no small task for
China to clean up its act. For a country as big as China, whose primary energy
source is coal and whose energy needs are growing at unprecedented rates, there
is no simple way out. That said, change is happening.
Forbes reported that China is closing more than 5000 coal mines this year
as it moves towards natural gas. Officially, however, these closures were
linked to safety concerns. China’s coal mining industry is responsible for more
than 5000 deaths every year. Socially sustainable? I’d say no. At the same time
China turns away from coal, the have become the world’s largest producer and
consumer of solar panels and is set to overtake France (even at its best) in
nuclear power capacity (though Fukishima
has slowed their progress).
It would seem China is realizing
that all three realms of sustainability are necessary to create a functioning
and sustainable society. They seem to be taking large steps in the right
direction. Who knows if it will be enough. Their efforts, in my opinion, are
admirable (though I still have a long list of social and environmental grievances
against them) in that they are ambitious and significant. I actually believe
the U.S. could learn from their actions; learn to take more significant and confident
steps towards renewables or nuclear, for example. China, too, could learn a
thing or two about human rights from the United States. Moral of the story, I
guess: we all have a lot to learn.
This is really interesting and I'm glad that you inserted Ben's link as well! I also liked the link to Treehugger.com. I found it very useful!
ReplyDelete