Carbon
Capture technologies are advancing, but is it possible for carbon dioxide to be
safely stored underground?
Carbon
capture consists of three main steps: trapping and separating CO2 from other
gases, transporting the captured CO2 to a storage area away from the
atmosphere, be it deep underground or at the depths of oceans.
This
process might seem like a cure-all for humanity’s emission problem, but it
needs to be coupled with other efforts to reduce CO2 emissions. The process has
not been occurring long enough to have a full analysis of the environmental
impacts. The problem lies primarily in the principle. Capturing carbon dioxide
emissions and storing them underground will not teach any society to emit less
from the beginning.
It
costs a lot of energy to store carbon dioxide, some estimates indicate up to
40% of a power station’s capacity. Storing carbon dioxide under the oceans or
ground can’t be a very safe idea. It’s hard to say what would happen with a gas
leak in a system buried under ground. If a carbon dioxide leak happened in
sub-ocean locations, it could potentially accelerate the already occurring
acidification.
Storing
carbon dioxide will not solve the world wide emission problem. The process may
help, but it could potentially compromise many ecosystems. The most efficient
way to reduce emissions is to put new policies in place to reduce carbon
dioxide release.
For
more information: http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/carbon-capture.htm
If you research more on CCS tech, studies and articles show that the process is not economically efficient, it costs way too much and takes too ling to implement. In fact the only economically viable method is in combination with a once spent oil well, they pump the CO2 in, and more oil comes out, thus contributing to more fossil fuel use.
ReplyDelete